Natallie Durson, a regular forum terrorist of the sort described by B. Burston in a currently running article, apparently loves the fact that wars, of a certainty, result in civilian deaths, particularly when those fighting choose to operate from civilian areas, as do the likes of Hamas. The Geneva Conventions recognize this fact and make it a war crime to operate from civilian areas, and place the blame of resulting deaths on those who choose to use civilians as a shield in that way.
But Natallie apparenlty loves the fact that this occurs, because it provides her cover when she finds that it will aid her propaganda campaign against Israel to wholly ignore the difference between setting out to kill civilians as tactical choice and proceeding with an attack on, e.g., Palestinians shooting rockets at Israeli civilians even when it is likely that Palestinian civilians will be hurt or killed.
For people choosing propaganda over truth, like Natallie, its like manna from heaven. |
|
